Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1699

reference
94-tree-1
name
1699
tree-preservation-order

undefined

94-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007283 50.863304)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007212 50.863296,-1.007215 50.863310,-1.007225 50.863323,-1.007241 50.863333,-1.007260 50.863340,-1.007282 50.863342,-1.007304 50.863340,-1.007324 50.863334,-1.007340 50.863324,-1.007350 50.863312,-1.007354 50.863298,-1.007351 50.863284,-1.007341 50.863271,-1.007326 50.863261,-1.007306 50.863254,-1.007284 50.863252,-1.007262 50.863254,-1.007242 50.863260,-1.007226 50.863270,-1.007216 50.863283,-1.007212 50.863296)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL